Legal Opinion
Camco, Inc. v. Baker
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided April 24, 1997No. 29119PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Several former employees of SuperPawn, owned by Cameo, Inc. (Cameo), opened a pawn shop in Bullhead City, Arizona (which borders Nevada, near Laughlin), shortly after resigning from SuperPawn. While employed at SuperPawn, these former employees had signed a contract in which they agreed not to compete with SuperPawn, after leaving SuperPawn’s employ, for a period of two years, within fifty miles of any SuperPawn store either existing or under construction, or any location which was the target of SuperPawn’s plan for expansion.
Cameo sought a preliminary injunction to enjoin these former…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Corroon & Black of Illinois, Inc. v. MagnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Southwest Gas Corp. v. AhmadNevada Supreme Court · 1983
- Hotel Riviera, Inc. v. TorresNevada Supreme Court · 1981
- Dixon v. ThatcherNevada Supreme Court · 1987
- Ellis v. McDanielNevada Supreme Court · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by17 opinions
- Baldonado v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Traffic Control Services, Inc. v. United Rentals Northwest, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Runzheimer International, Ltd. v. David FriedlenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- Lucht's Concrete Pumping, Inc. v. HornerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- Shores v. Global Experience Specialists, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.