Legal Opinion

Charles Noeding Trucking Co. v. United States

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided October 4, 1939No. 5815PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs, six in number, motor vehicle carriers for hire, variously engaged in the trucking business between New York City on the one hand and points in Newark, Elizabeth, Linden, Carteret and Perth Amboy, New Jersey, on the other, have filed a bill pursuant to the provisions of the Urgent Deficiencies Act, Act of October 22, 1913, U.S.Code, Title 28, § 41 (27) and (28) and sections 43-48, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 41 (27, 28), 43-48, seeking to have this statutory court enjoin the enforcement of an order made by the Interstate Commerce Commission, Division 5, under the Motor…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. South Bend Federation of Teachers v. National Education Ass'n-South BendIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Downing v. Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Aluminum Co. of Amer. v. Admiral Merch. Motor Frgt., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
  4. State Ex Rel. Basham v. Medical Licensing Board of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Motor Haulage Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API