Legal Opinion

Woolcott v. State Board of Education

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 14, 1984No. Docket 69391PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtT. Gillespie, J.

Lindy Woolcott has severe speech and hearing defects. To mainstream Lindy from special education classes to general education classes, the Traverse Bay Area Intermediate School District (hereafter ISD) hired a cued speech interpreter. The cued speech instructor was used for only one term in Lindy’s general education classes. Thereafter, Lindy’s parents objected to ISD’s refusal to use the cued speech interpreter in Lindy’s general education classes. Administrative hearings were held and the result was approval of ISD’s refusal. Lindy’s parents then filed suit in circuit court challenging the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Sanders Ex Rel. Sanders v. Marquette Public SchoolsDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1983
  3. William S. v. GillDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
  4. Reeder v. HammondMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Flint Board of Education v. WilliamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Waterman Ex Rel. Waterman v. Marquette-Alger Intermediate School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1990
  2. Barwacz v. Michigan Department of EducationDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1987
  3. Zdrowski v. RieckDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
  4. Jenkins v. Carney-Nadeau Public SchoolMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Johnson v. ClarkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API