Legal Opinion

People v. Roman

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 6, 2001No. B145118, B149269PublishedCited by 7 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRIGNON, Acting P. J.

Defendant and appellant Arthur Roman was convicted of possession of a small quantity of methamphetamine and admitted three prior serious felony convictions within the meaning of Penal Code section 1170.12. Defendant was sentenced to 25 years to life in prison, pursuant to the “Three Strikes” law. While defendant’s appeal was pending, the newly elected Los Angeles District Attorney, Stephen Cooley, issued a directive to his deputies that certain prosecutions, including controlled substance charges without quantity enhancements, were to be presumed by the deputies to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. People v. BirksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. NasalgaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. People v. RossiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. VeraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. County of Santa Clara v. EscobarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. People v. Onesra Enters., Inc.California Superior Court · 2018
  4. People v. VeraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Nazir v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API