Turner v. SMITH
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by
Cer-cone, J.:
Upon consideration of the court’s charge in full, and in light of the facts and circumstances of this case, I do not believe that the lower court’s reference to “assured-clear-distance-ahead” constituted a charge thereon. On the other hand, I do agree that the court’s refusal to charge on reckless driving was error. Therefore, for the reasons which follow, I would affirm the judgments entered in favor of the passengers against the drivers of the two vehicles in question, Terry Lake and Charles Smith. However, I would reverse and remand for a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fleischman v. ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Action Industries, Inc. v. WiedemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Stark v. Fullerton Trucking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Gaber Et Ux. v. WeinbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Rich v. Petersen Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.