Legal Opinion

Vick Chemical Co. v. Vick Medicine Co.

District Court, S.D. Georgia

Decided July 21, 1925No. 93PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRETT, District Judge.

This suit arises under the trade-mark laws of the United States. It is further contended that, irrespective of the registration of the trademark, complainant is entitled to the relief sought on the ground of unfair competition. The same principles control, for “the common law of trade-marks is but a part of the broader law of unfair competition” (Hanover Milling Co. v. Metcalf, 240 U. S. 413, 36 S. Ct. 360, 60 L. Ed. 713) with this modification : “While in a ease for unfair competition it may be necessary to show intent to deceive the public, in a ease for violation of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. International News Service v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Howe Scale Co. v. Wyckoff, Seamans & BenedictSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Florence Mfg. Co. v. J. C. Dowd & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania State University v. University Orthopedics, Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Goebel Brewing Co. v. Esslingers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Gamlen Chemical Co. v. GamlenDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. General Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. FuessDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1961
  5. Winthrop Chemical Co. v. WeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API