Legal Opinion
General Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Fuess
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided February 17, 1961No. Civ. A. 9059PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANNAY, Chief Judge.
Findings of Fact
Plaintiff is a New York corporation, with its principal office in New York City, and with a permit to do business in the State of Texas.
Defendants are individual residents of Harris County, Texas, doing business in Harris County, Texas and elsewhere as General Adjustment Service, with its principal place of business in Houston, Texas.
The business of plaintiff is the adjustment of losses under contracts of insur anee issued by fire and casualty insurance companies.
All stock shares of plaintiff are held only by stock insurance companies or a nominee thereof,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Yale Electric Corporation v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Thaddeus Davids Co. v. Davids Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Pure Foods, Inc. v. Minute Maid Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- Brooks Bros. v. Brooks Clothing of California, Ltd.District Court, S.D. California · 1945
- Ambassador East, Inc. v. Orsatti, Inc., and Arnold OrsattiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- American Heritage Life Insurance Company, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. Heritage Life Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- King-Size, Inc. v. Frank's King Size Clothes, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1982
- Edmark Industries SDN. Bhd. v. South Asia International (H.K.) Ltd.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2000
- Jud Plumbing Shop on Wheels, Inc. v. Jud Plumbing & Heating Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1985
- Bell v. Starbucks U.S. Brands Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.