Legal Opinion

Whiteford v. Hitchcock

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1889PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Missaukee. (Aldrich, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

This suit was brought to recover damages for the breach of an alleged contract for the sale of a-boat. The plaintiff recovered judgment in the Missaukee circuit court for the sum of $133.15.

The evidence of the contract was this: On or about July 10, 1887, the plaintiff, who lived at Lake City, had a talk at that place with the defendant Hitchcock. Hitchcock asked him what he would take for his boat. Plaintiff tplc) hinj hq would take $800 for it there on the *209dock. Hitchcock said he would give $900 if plaintiff would deliver it at Muskegon. He gave plaintiff his address and went away.…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bowen v. McCarthyMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Guyan Coal & Coke Co. v. Wholesale Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
  3. A. E. Smith & Co. v. ShanksOhio Superior Court, Cincinnati · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API