Bowen v. McCarthy
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Schoolcraft. (Steere, J.) Bill for specific performance of land contract. Complainant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
This is a suit for the specific performance of a land contract.
Complainant, at the time of the transaction, lived in Manistique, Mich., the defendant in Menekaunee, Wis. Defendant was the owner of the land in question, being a village lot in Manistique, situated next to the lot on which complainant resided. Complainant, being desirous to purchase, wrote to defendant to ascertain if he would *27sell, and upon what terms. Defendant sent the following reply:
“Menekaunee, April 4, 1890.
“ Dr. O. O. Bowen,—
“Dear Sir: Your letter of recent date at hand, and contents noted. In reply will say you can have…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Whiteford v. HitchcockMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by7 opinions
- Leadbetter v. PriceOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Thompson v. BurnsIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
- Mossie v. CyrusOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Lee v. HedenskoogMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Burton v. LaddMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.