Legal Opinion

A. E. Smith & Co. v. Shanks

Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati

Decided April 20, 1908Published

1Opinion of the Court

The action below was for damages for breach of contract. Plaintiffs in error were defendants below and defendants in error plaintiffs below.

The cause w.as submitted to the court (a jury having been waived) .and in due course judgment was rendered for plaintiffs below (defendants in error), for the amount claimed, seventeen hundred dollars and interest.

Plaintiffs in error seek to reverse said judgment, and it is contended that the court erred with reference to its conclusions as to what constituted the terms of the contract, the construction 'of the contract; and further, that the verdict or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Baker v. HoltWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Whiteford v. HitchcockMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API