Legal Opinion

Metcalf v. Houk

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 1994No. 76A05-9310-CV-374PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RUCKER, Judge.

This case involves a dispute over an easement. The issue presented is whether the conveyance of an easement appurtenant that expressly grants "ingress and egress" over the grantor's property "to the water's edge" contemplates the right of the easement holders to build, maintain and use a pier at the lake end of the easement on the servient parcel. The trial court determined that it did not and granted a permanent injunction in favor of the servient owner. Owners of the easement now appeal.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

In 1990, Plaintiff-Appellee Sherie Lee…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Donavan v. Ivy Knoll Apartments PartnershipIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Litzelswope v. MitchellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Indiana Broadcasting Corp. v. Star Stations of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Badger v. HillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  5. Board of Com'rs of Vanderburgh Cty. v. JoeckelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. McCauley v. HarrisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Blalock v. ConzelmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  3. Carnahan v. Moriah Property Owners Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Drees Co., Inc. v. ThompsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Gunderson v. RondinelliIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API