Legal Opinion
Board of Com'rs of Vanderburgh Cty. v. Joeckel
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided July 15, 1980No. 1-280A35PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEAL, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
This is an appeal from a judgment in an inverse condemnation proceeding in favor of plaintiff-appellee Anna Joeckel (Plaintiff) and against defendant-appellant Board of Commissioners of Vanderburgh County, Indiana (Defendant).
We affirm.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
Defendant planned, contracted for, and completed a bridge project which necessitated the acquisition of two separate easements from Plaintiff, a 73-year-old widow. The easements were negotiated and executed for Defendant by an agent. Plaintiff was paid $2,260. The evidence discloses that no mention was made of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- City of Bloomington v. HoltIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Guerrettaz v. Public Service Co. of Ind., Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1949
- State v. JORDANIndiana Supreme Court · 1966
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. SimpsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
- Hagaman v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Macy Elevator, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Litzelswope v. MitchellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- North Snow Bay, Inc. v. HamiltonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. Kimco of Evansville, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2009
- Harlan Bakeries, Inc. v. MuncyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.