Legal Opinion

Frame v. City of Arlington

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 15, 2011No. 08-10630PublishedCited by 266 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENAVIDES and PRADO, Circuit Judges:

Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA),1 like § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act,2 provides that individuals with disabilities shall not “be denied the benefits of the services, programs, or activities of a public entity, or be subjected to dis*221crimination by any such entity.” For nearly two decades, Title II’s implementing regulations have required cities to make newly built and altered sidewalks readily accessible to individuals with disabilities. The plaintiffs-appellants in this case, five individuals with disabilities, allege that…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by266 opinions

  1. April Cadena v. El Paso CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  2. Gerald Caldwell v. KHOU-TVCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  3. King-White v. Humble Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  4. Dennis Sharkey v. Eral O'NealCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. Fred Taylor v. City of ShreveportCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015

261 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API