Legal Opinion

The Oriental v. Barclay

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 3, 1897PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from Dallas. Tried below before Hon. R. E. Burke.

1Opinion of the Court

FINLEY,

Associate Justice.—The general statement of the nature of the case contained in the brief of The Oriental Investment Company, appellant, is sufficiently accurate and full to render the points discussed in the opinion clear, with the aid of the further statements made in the opinion. We will therefore use such statement:

This suit was originally brought hy plaintiff below, Maggie Barclay, against the defendants, the Oriental Hotel Company, a Texas corporation, and W. J. Alden, a resident of Dallas, Texas. By amendment, plaintiff also sued The Oriental, a Texas corporation, and The…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. McCamant v. BatsellTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Howard Hume, Administrators, Etc. v. WindomTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Goldfrank, Frank & Co. v. YoungTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  5. State v. SnyderTexas Supreme Court · 1886

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Isrin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Humphreys v. RobersonTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Sanders v. Republic National Bank of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  4. Hagenauer v. Detroit Copper Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Armstrong v. MaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API