Legal Opinion
Oreizi v. County of Fresno
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 17, 2022No. 1:18-cv-00662Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 FARSHAD OREIZI, CASE NO. 1:18-cv-00662-AWI-EPG 7 Plaintiff, ORDER ON COUNTY OF FRESNO’S 8 v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 9 COUNTY OF FRESNO and DOES 1 (Doc. No. 66) through 20, inclusive, 10 Defendants. 11 12 13 This case involves Plaintiff Farshad Oreizi’s allegations of discrimination, retaliation, and 14 unpaid overtime wages against his former employer Defendant County of Fresno. Now before the 15 Court is the County’s motion for summary judgment, which challenges Oreizi’s six remaining 16 causes of action. For the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Robin Fortyune v. American Multi-Cinema, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.