Legal Opinion

People v. Quicke

California Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1969No. Crim. 8754PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

This is an automatic appeal, under section 1239, subdivision (b), of the Penal Code, from a judgment imposing the death penalty upon defendant for the first degree murder of Susan Nash. On defendant’s first appeal we affirmed the judgment of guilt but reversed the judgment as to penalty. (People v. Quicke (1964) 61 Cal.2d 155 [37 Cal.Rptr. 617, 390 P.2d 393].) At the second penalty trial the jury again fixed the penalty at death; this appeal followed.

We shall explain why the judgment in the second penalty trial must be reversed because the trial court committed error of the type condemned in…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. RobertsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. People v. CahillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People v. PoggiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. People v. HollowayCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API