Legal Opinion

Heinsohn v. William Clairmont, Inc.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1985No. Civ. 10767PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIERKE, Justice.

Harlan Heinsohn appeals from a judgment dismissing his alternative claims against William Clairmont, Inc. [Clairmont] for permanent injunctive relief and rescission of his purchase of lots in a residential subdivision. We affirm.

The circumstances giving rise to this action are set forth in Heinsohn v. William Clairmont, Inc., 333 N.W.2d 697 (N.D.1983), and need not be repeated here. Briefly stated, Heinsohn claimed that Clair-mont, as owner and developer of the lots, constructed a townhouse “over two stories in height” in violation of a restrictive covenant. At the time of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fleck v. FleckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Eakman v. RobbNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Sandstrom v. LarsenHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Peters v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Graven v. BackusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of RohrichNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. American Bank Center v. WiestNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Borsheim v. O & J PROPERTIESNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Kopperud v. ReillyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Golden Eye Resources, LLC v. GanskeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API