Legal Opinion
Kopperud v. Reilly
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 27, 1990No. Civ. 890182PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GIERKE, Justice.
This is an appeal by Lorraine Reilly (Lorraine) and Daniel Reilly (Daniel) from a county court judgment which rescinded a contract involving the sale of Earls Raymond Johnston’s (Ray) farmland to Daniel due to the fact that as conservator of Ray’s estate, Lorraine was affected by a substantial conflict of interest when she authorized the sale to her son, Daniel. We affirm.
In January of 1979, Lorraine and Nina McBride were court appointed as co-conservators of Ray’s financial affairs. The con-servatorship was formed because of Ray’s confused mental and emotional state following…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miller Enterprises, Inc. v. Dog N' Cat Pet Centers of America, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- General Electric Credit Corp. v. RichmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Jordan v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Cudworth v. CudworthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Estate of Sorensen v. SorensenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Schumacher v. SchumacherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- First National Bank & Trust Co. of Williston v. BrakkenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Matter of Estate of ZimblemanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- In the Matter of Estate of AllmarasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Matter of Estate of RidlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.