Legal Opinion

Newman v. Sonnenberg

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided November 21, 2003No. 20020782-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THORNE, Jr., Judge:

T1 Charlene S. Newman appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Brent C. Sonnenberg, D.D.S. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

12 Newman's regular dentist referred Newman to Sonnenberg, an endodontist, for a root canal. Upon arriving at Sonnenberg's office, Newman signed an "Informed Consent" form. Sonnenberg took several x-rays, conducted a "pulp test" on several teeth, examined an existing temporary crown, and administered a local anesthetic. Sonnenberg determined that Newman was in need of a root canal and directed his office administrator to review the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Nixdorf v. HickenUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Ault v. HoldenUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Cox v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  4. Ortiz v. Shah, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1995
  5. King v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gables at Sterling Vill. Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. Castlewood-Sterling Vill. I, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Joseph v. McCannCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006
  3. Fries v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006
  4. Newman v. SonnenbergCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
  5. Wecker v. Salem Clinic, P.C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API