Legal Opinion

Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Peskin

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 2010No. 2009-2009PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Lawrence Frederick Peskin of Cleveland, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0059391, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1992. For violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct arising from his possessing and using crack cocaine, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline recommends that we impose a two-year suspension, stayed upon conditions. We accept the board’s findings of misconduct. However, we conclude that respondent’s conduct, his failure to acknowledge the seriousness of his misconduct, and his obvious resentment over the consequences of his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. MayOhio Supreme Court · 2005

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. SigalovOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. Lindon (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Ohio State Bar Assn. v. PeskinOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Ohio State Bar Assn. v. ResnickOhio Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API