Legal Opinion

Engquist v. Oregon Department of Agriculture

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 8, 2007No. 05-35170, 05-35263Published

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ANUP ENGQUIST,  Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 05-35170 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF  D.C. No. AGRICULTURE; JOSEPH (JEFF) HYATT; CV 02-1637 AS JOHN SZCZEPANSKI, Defendants-Appellants.  ANUP ENGQUIST,  Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 05-35263 v. OREGON DEPARTMENT OF  D.C. No. CV 02-1637 AS AGRICULTURE; JOSEPH (JEFF) HYATT; OPINION JOHN SZCZEPANSKI, Defendants-Appellees.  Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Donald C. Ashmanskas, Magistrate Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted July 27, 2006—Portland,…

2Cases cited101 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API