Legal Opinion

Jeung v. McKrow

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided April 9, 2003No. 01-10204-BCPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE IN PART, GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON FEDERAL CLAIMS, AND REMANDING STATE LAW CLAIMS TO STATE COURT

LAWSON, District Judge.

This case arises from a dispute between the plaintiff, a physician, and the defendants, who participate in the operation of Hills & Dales Hospital, concerning the withdrawal of staff privileges from the plaintiff and the refusal by hospital representatives to honor certain agreements with the plaintiff. The case began in the Tuscola County, Michigan Circuit…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Marlin v. Robertson, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009
  2. Burton v. William Beaumont HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
  3. Sanders v. City of HodgenvilleDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2018
  4. Brintley v. St. Mary Mercy HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012
  5. Grant v. Trinity Health-MichiganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API