Legal Opinion

Secretary, Agency of Natural Resources v. Short

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 5, 1996No. 94-091PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The Agency of Natural Resources (“Agency”) appeals from a decision of the Environmental Law Division (“ELD”) involving Environmental Board Rule 2(A)(6), commonly known as the “Road Rule.” The ELD held that construction of a shared access road, over a thousand feet in length, did not trigger Act 250 jurisdiction because part of the road was a shared driveway, and not a “road” for purposes of the Road Rule. We affirm.

Defendants Terrence and Camille Short obtained local approval for a four-lot subdivision of the property in 1989, and sold two of the four lots. In 1990, the Shorts inquired of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hudson v. Town of East MontpelierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  2. In Re RusinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Green Crow Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  2. In Re Appeal of S-S Corp./Rooney Housing DevelopmentsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  3. SEC. AGENCY OF NAT. RESOURCES v. ShortSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  4. In Re Appeal of S-S Corp./Rooney Housing DevelopmentsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  5. zimpfer v. davisVermont Superior Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API