Legal Opinion

zimpfer v. davis

Vermont Superior Court

Decided May 16, 2024No. 21-cv-586Published

1Opinion of the Court

VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL DIVISION Windsor Unit Case No. 21-CV-00586 12 The Green Woodstock VT 05091 802-457-2121 www.vermontjudiciary.org Robert Zimpfer and Judith Zimpfer Plaintiffs v. Patricia Davis, Alwyn Dawkins, Nadia Dawkins, Alice Nitka, Lloyd Senior, Marilyn A. Comey as trustee for the Marilyn A. Comey Revocable Trust, Okemo Pines LLC, and the Town of Ludlow Defendants Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law At issue is whether plaintiffs Robert and Judith Zimpfer may use an easement to access their property in Ludlow, Vermont. The following factual findings and conclusions of law…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re Appeals of Shantee Point, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  2. Community Feed Store, Inc. v. Northeastern Culvert Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  3. Bodman v. BodmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Russell v. PareSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
  5. Weeks v. Wolf Creek Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API