Legal Opinion

Walsh v. Taitt

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1905No. Docket No. 25PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Bay; Shepard, J. Replevin by Thomas Walsh and John Walsh against George R. Taitt. There was judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

Defendant and James Gilmore, copartners, were engaged in the grocery business in Bay City. This firm became a customer of the National Grocer Company (Gustin, Cook & Buckley Branch), changing to them from another concern upon an agreement that credit to the amount of $1,000 would be extended. In November, 1902, their indebtedness was about $1,500. Buckley, the manager of the creditor company, requested that this account be reduced to $1,000 by December 1st following. This was agreed to, and payments aggregating $380 made, and moneys were accumulating to pay the balance agreed upon. Defendant,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Watkins v. WallaceMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Wilson v. BowenMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Ferris v. McQueenMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Gumberg v. TreuschMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. McNaughton v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. RichMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Silverstone v. London Assurance Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. J. H. Worden Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
  4. In re Stockdale's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Disner v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API