Legal Opinion

Spears v. City of Indianapolis

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 19, 1996No. 95-1565PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge.

“What a diffrence a day makes ... twenty-four little hours.”

(Dinah Washington,1 Circa Summer of 1959)

This case is about “what a difference a day makes ... twenty-four little hours” when responding to a motion for summary judgment. If Charles Spears and the other plaintiffs had twenty-four little hours more they might still be in the case. Without twenty-four little hours extra they definitely are out of court. And “that’s the diffrence a day makes.”

Our case arises from Mr. Spears’ mostly unsuccessful venture into the taxicab business in the city of Indianapolis…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Robert Geiserman v. John H. MacDonald A.B. & A.B. & AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  2. Andrea Geiger v. Donald AllenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Adams v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  2. Cheryl A. Gile v. United Airlines, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Wanda Raymond v. Ameritech Corporation, D/B/A Sbc AmeritechCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  4. Yancick v. Hanna Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  5. Smith v. SevernCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API