Spears v. City of Indianapolis
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge.
“What a diffrence a day makes ... twenty-four little hours.”
(Dinah Washington,1 Circa Summer of 1959)
This case is about “what a difference a day makes ... twenty-four little hours” when responding to a motion for summary judgment. If Charles Spears and the other plaintiffs had twenty-four little hours more they might still be in the case. Without twenty-four little hours extra they definitely are out of court. And “that’s the diffrence a day makes.”
Our case arises from Mr. Spears’ mostly unsuccessful venture into the taxicab business in the city of Indianapolis…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Robert Geiserman v. John H. MacDonald A.B. & A.B. & AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Andrea Geiger v. Donald AllenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
3Cited by72 opinions
- Adams v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Cheryl A. Gile v. United Airlines, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Wanda Raymond v. Ameritech Corporation, D/B/A Sbc AmeritechCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Yancick v. Hanna Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Smith v. SevernCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.