Legal Opinion

Mouat v. Seattle, Lake Shore & Eastern Railway Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1896No. 2374PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County.—Hon. James Z. Moore, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The. opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, C. J.

Plaintiff deeded to the defendant, railroad corporation the property, the title to which is in controversy, and the object of this action was to remove the cloud caused by this deed, it being claimed that for a breach of the condition therein the title conveyed thereby had reverted to the plaintiff; and upon the construction of this condition the rights of the parties largely depend.

It was claimed on the part of the defendants that it was a condition subsequent, the violation of which would subject the estate to forfeiture; while the claim…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Barlow v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1870

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Oklahoma City v. Local Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  2. Halvorsen v. Pacific CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Scheller v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Watkins v. Iowa Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  5. Washington State Grange v. BrandtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API