United States v. Bahram Mechanic, A/K/A Barry Mechanic, A/K/A Myron Bahram Mechanic, and Mary Akers Mechanic
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GEE, Circuit Judge:
Bahram and Mary Mechanic were convicted of attempting to export a microwave calibration device without a validated export license, in violation of the Export Administration Act (EAA) of 1979 and regulations promulgated under that Act. They raise a constitutional challenge to the regulation that proscribes attempts to violate the Act. Because we conclude there is no constitutional infirmity, we AFFIRM.
Facts
The facts relevant to this appeal are undisputed. Bahram (Barry) Mechanic and his ex-sister-in-law, Mary Akers Mechanic, constituted the entire personnel roster for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Zemel v. RuskSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Manuel Samora, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Gabriel Gurrola-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Eugene You-Tsai Hsu, United States of America v. David Tzuwei YangCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Micei International v. Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- United States v. QuinnDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Times Publishing Co. v. United States Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Times Publishing Co. v. Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.