Legal Opinion

Allen v. Withrow

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 9, 1959No. 20622PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

A contract between a husband and wife made with the intention of promoting a dissolution of the marriage relation existing between them is contrary to public policy and is illegal and void. Birch v. Anthony, 109 Ga. 349 (34 S. E. 561, 77 Am. St. Rep. 379); Powers v. Powers, 158 Ga. 251 (123 S. E. 220); Law v. Law, 186 Ga. 113, 116 (197 S. E. 272). But where, as in this case, the husband and wife were living in a state of separation, and the wife was suing the husband for divorce and alimony, they could enter into a valid and enforceable contract settling the issue as to alimony.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Sumner v. SumnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Sumner v. SumnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Brown v. FarkasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  4. Mitchell v. ArnallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  5. Estes v. EstesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Citizens & Southern National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  2. Reynolds v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
  3. Robbins v. National Bank of Ga.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  4. Shepherd v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
  5. Jarrett v. JarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API