Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Arnall

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 18, 1948No. 16144PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, Chief Justice..

A son, alleged to have been born after the execution of the will of his father, which made no provision for after-born children, and which left the entire estate to his wife, brought suit in ejectment against those purchasing for value from antecedent purchasers for value under a foreclosure against the mother, on the faith of the probate in solemn form of said will after the child had been made a party to the probate proceeding by the appointment of a guardian ad litem, who by his answer in that proceeding stated that after investigation he knew of no legal reason why…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Florida Yellow Pine Co. v. Flint River Naval Stores Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  2. Lydia Pinkham Medicine Co. v. GibbsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  3. Stuckey v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Alabama Midland Railway Co. v. GuilfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  5. Saliba v. SalibaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Allen v. WithrowSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
  2. Williams v. KaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  3. McGreggor v. W. L. Florence Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  4. Carter v. General Finance & Thrift Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  5. Matthews Group & Associates, Inc. v. WagesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API