Legal Opinion
Continental Oil Co. v. Hayes
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 10, 1932No. 22720PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
Petitioners bring this original action to review an award made by the State Industrial Commission in favor of respondent Leonard Hayes, herein referred to as claimant, and against petitioners.
On August 13, 1929, claimant received certain accidental injuries coming within and covered by the Workmen’s Compensation Law, while in the employ of petitioner Continental Oil Company. Employer’s first notice of injury was filed August 17, 1929. Report of initial payment by the insurance carrier was filed August 21, 1929, and included the statement: “This is final.” September 9, 1929, employee’s first…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Marland Production Co. v. HoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. RaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Carl B. King Drilling Co. v. FarleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Higbee v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Makins Sand & Gravel Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Briscoe Const. Co. v. ListermanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Richardson v. M. & D. Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Sparkman v. Cosden Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Swift & Co. v. WaldenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Boettcher v. Marland Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.