Legal Opinion

Allbritton v. Sunray Oil Corporation

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided December 16, 1949No. 4522PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Circuit Judge.

In this action for damages for personal injuries, tried to a jury under special issues of fact, the verdict of the jury found the material issues in favor of the plaintiff and assessed his damages at $125,000. Judgment was entered on the verdict of the jury for that amount against the defendant, Sunray Oil Corporation, which has moved (1) for a judgment non obstante veredicto; (2) for a new trial; and (3) for a remittitur of the damages. The trial judge has been afforded the benefit of helpful extensive oral arguments, both upon the law and upon the facts, and has…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. East Texas Motor Freight Lines v. LoftisTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  2. West Texas Utilities Co. v. RennerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  3. Hanson v. PonderTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  4. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. BeasleyTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Traders & General Ins. Co. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Roosth & Genecov Production Co. v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Sunray Oil Corporation v. AllbrittonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  3. The Yorkshire Indemnity Company of New York (Also Known as the Yorkshire Insurance Company of New York) v. Roosth & Genecov Production CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  4. George C. Vaughan & Sons v. DyessCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  5. Thompson v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API