Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Ponder

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided November 30, 1927No. 997-4866PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNickels, J.

Hanson sought recovery for personal injuries. A peremptory instruction against him was given and the judgment rendered upon a verdict in response was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 293 S. W. 219. Whether negligence and cause be issuable are amongst the basic questions here.

Inter alia, common carrier obligations include, the duty to supply such ears and equipment as may be reasonably suitable and safe for carriage and delivery of the particular sort of commodity offered for conveyance. 4 R. C. L. 682. That duty in its direct aspects is owed to the shipper and consignee’ and has…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gussie Fox v. Dallas Hotel Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Middleton v. Texas Power & Light Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Middleton v. Texas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Robinson v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. The GermanicSupreme Court of the United States · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Fort Worth Lloyds v. HaygoodTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Turner v. Texas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Traders & General Ins. Co. v. West Texas Utilities Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1942
  4. Houston Gas & Fuel Co. v. PerryTexas Commission of Appeals · 1936
  5. Hart v. Traders & General InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1945

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API