Legal Opinion

Helling v. Carey

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1974No. 42775PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunter, J.

This case arises from a malpractice action instituted by the plaintiff (petitioner), Barbara Helling.

The plaintiff suffers from primary open angle glaucoma. Primary open angle glaucoma is essentially a condition of the eye in which there is an interference in the ease with which the nourishing fluids can flow out of the eye. Such a condition results in pressure gradually rising above the normal level to such an extent that damage is produced to the optic nerve and its fibers with resultant loss in vision. The first loss usually occurs in the periphery of the field of vision. The disease…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BehymerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. The Tj HooperCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  3. Pederson v. DumouchelWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Helling v. CareyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Ranger Ins. Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Ranger Insurance v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Harbeson v. Parke-Davis, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Hall v. HilbunMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Harris v. GrothWashington Supreme Court · 1983

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API