Woods v. Wright

John A. Fogleman, Justice.

Appellant contends there was error in a decree requiring him to specifically perform a contract for the sale of an undivided two-thirds interest in a 400-acre tract of land in Searcy County to Dr. William K. Wright. Appellant himself was a purchaser from J. A. Gates and Doris M. Gates, his wife. We find no reversible error on any of the four points relied upon by appellant, viz:

I. Appellant is a bona fide purchaser for value, and his equity in the 400 acres is superior to that of appellee, Wright, who should be restricted to his remedy of rescission and recovery of…