Legal Opinion

Marshall v. State

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 23, 1994No. 93-1339PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In these cross-petitions for writ of certio-rari, the State challenges the district court’s rejection of the “some evidence” standard applicable in prison disciplinary actions, and the inmate contests the court’s willingness to uphold a prison policy of not informing inmates when requested witnesses have refused to testify. For reasons that follow, we sustain the State’s writ and annul the prisoner’s.

In December 1991, Thomas Marshall and several other inmates were observed fighting in an exercise pen at the Iowa Men’s Reformatory. Marshall was injured in the fracas. Prison disciplinary…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Backstrom v. Iowa District Court for Jones CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  4. Mahers v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  5. Picard v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sanford v. ManternachSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  2. State of Iowa v. Iowa District Court for Jones CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  3. Amended February 27, 2017 State of Iowa v. Iowa District Court for Jones CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  4. Marshall v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  5. State of Iowa v. Iowa District Court for Jones CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API