Legal Opinion

Aukam v. Zantzinger

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 17, 1902PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyd, J.

There was a motion to dismiss the appeal in this case but, as intimated at the oral argument, we think the affidavits filed sufficiently show that the appellant was not responsible for the delay in transmitting the record to this Court and the motion will therefore be overruled.

The appeal was taken from an order refusing to vacate an order of ratification of a resale made by Phil. H. Tuck, an attorney named in a mortgage given by Frederick G. Aukam and wife to German H. Hunt, and dismissing the petition filed seeking that and other relief. A sale of the mortgaged property to the appellant for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kent v. RicardsHigh Court of Chancery of Maryland · 1850
  2. Cockey v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
  3. Henck v. TodhunterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1826
  4. Warfield v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
  5. Warehime v. Carroll County Building Ass'n, No. 1Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1876

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Simard v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. McCann v. McGinnisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  3. White v. SimardCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. Mizen v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
  5. Middendorf v. Baltimore Refrigerating & Heating Co. of Baltimore CityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API