Legal Opinion

Middendorf v. Baltimore Refrigerating & Heating Co. of Baltimore City

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 6, 1911PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City (StOCKBEIDGB, J.).

1Opinion of the CourtBoyd, C. J.

A bill was filed on November 3rd, 1910, by Messrs. Mid-dendorf and Heyward, committee, and Robert M. Spedden against the Baltimore Refrigerating and Heating Company of Baltimore City, the Continental Trust Company and others. The plaintiffs sued for themselves as well as for all other holders of the bonds of the Refrigerating and Heating Company who would come in and contribute to the expenses of the suit. That company under date of October 1st, 1902, executed to the Continental Trust Company, as trustee, a mortgage to secure an issue of two thousand bonds of the par value of $1,000 each. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Garritee v. PoppleinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1891
  2. Aukam v. ZantzingerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
  3. Lenderking v. RosenthalCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885
  4. Wampler v. WolfingerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1859

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cook v. BoehlCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  2. McCann v. McGinnisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  3. Johnson & Higgins, Inc. v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  4. Bowles v. M. P. Moller, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  5. McKay v. PaulsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API