Legal Opinion
Southern Music Pub. Co. v. Bibo-Lang, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 17, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLSEY, District Judge.
The motion to dismiss the complaint is-in all respects denied.
I. On August 17, 1934, I granted a motion made on behalf of the following defendants herein, George F. Briegel, Inc., De Sylva, Brown and Henderson, Inc., Edward B. Marks Music Corporation, Pauli-Pioneer Music Corporation, Robbins Music Corporation, Sam Fox and Harry Fox, copartners doing business under the firm name and style of Sam Fox Publishing Company, Hugo Frey and Carson J. Robinson, to dismiss the complaint herein, but gave leave to amend.
My memorandum, which was filed on August 18, 1934, read as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Callaghan v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- American Code Co. v. BensingerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Silverman v. Sunrise Pictures Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Werckmeister v. American Lithographic Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1905
3Cited by4 opinions
- National Comics Publications, Inc. v. Fawcett Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Basevi v. Edward O'Toole Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- Freedman v. Milnag Leasing CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1937
- Technicon Medical Information Systems Corp. v. Green Bay Packaging Inc., St. Vincent Hospital, and Leo N. CrowleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982