Legal Opinion

Behrens v. UNITED VACCINES DIV. OF HARLAN SPRAGUE

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided July 23, 2002No. Civ. 00-459 (RLE)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ERICKSON, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. Introduction

This matter came before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to the consent of the parties, as authorized by Title 18 U.S.C. § 636(c), upon the Motion of the Defendant United Vaccines, Inc., for a Partial Summary Judgment which seeks the dismissal of the Plaintiffs’ claim under Minnesota’s Consumer Fraud Act (“CFA”), Minnesota Statutes Section Sections 325F. 68-70, as implemented by Minnesota’s Private Attorney General Statute (“Private AG Statute”) Minnesota Statutes Section 8.31, Subdivision 3a. 1 A Hearing on…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Senn v. Tile Layers Protective UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Barbara McLaughlin v. Esselte Pendaflex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  5. prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 15,525 Juan Jaurequi v. Carter Manufacturing Co., Inc., John Deere Company Deere & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Tatone v. SunTrust Mortgage, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
  2. Berczyk v. Emerson Tool Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2003
  3. Kinetic Co. v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
  4. In Re Levaquin Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
  5. Buetow v. A.L.S. Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API