Legal Opinion

People v. Vasquez

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 2001No. Docket 116660PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkman, J.

We granted leave to consider whether defendant’s alleged conduct of lying to a police officer about his name and age, constituted an “obstruction” within the meaning of Michigan’s “resisting and obstructing” statute. MCL 750.479. Michigan’s “resisting and obstructing” statute does not proscribe any manner of interference with a *86police officer, and it also does not proscribe only conduct that poses a threat to the safety of police officers; rather, it proscribes threatened, either expressly or impliedly, physical interference and actual physical interference with a police officer. Therefore,…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Davis v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. FeolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. King v. St. Vincent's HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Brogan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. G C Timmis & Co. v. Guardian Alarm Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Risbridger v. ConnellyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  3. James Carey v. Nevada Gaming Control Board Gregory Spendlove State of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. MosleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  5. People v. CorrMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API