Legal Opinion

James Carey v. Nevada Gaming Control Board Gregory Spendlove State of Nevada

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 4, 2002No. 00-16649PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff James Carey brought this civil rights action against the State of Nevada, the Nevada Gaming Control Board, and Agent Gregory Spendlove under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law. He now appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to all defendants. We have jurisdic tion under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

BACKGROUND

On June 19 and June 20, 1996, plaintiff James Carey, a Nevada resident, and his friend, Ed Amsberry, were playing “21” at the Ramada Hotel and Casino in Laughlin, Nevada. Ramada employees suspected…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Shelley Savage v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205, Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Davis v. City of Las VegasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Trista Stanley, an Individual v. Trustees of the California State University California State University, SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc. v. Maxwell-JollyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Jordan v. State Ex Rel. Department of Motor Vehicles & Public SafetyNevada Supreme Court · 2005

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API