Legal Opinion

Carpenters & Joiners Union, Local No. 213 v. Ritter's Cafe

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 27, 1942No. 527PublishedCited by 232 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frankfurter

The facts of this case are simple. Ritter, the respondent, made an agreement with a contractor named Plaster for the construction of a building at 2810 Broadway, Houston, Texas. The contract gave Plaster the right to make his own arrangements regarding the employment of labor in the construction of the building. He employed nonunion carpenters and painters. The respondent was also *723the owner of Ritter’s Cafe, a restaurant at 418 Broadway, a mile and a half away. So far as the record discloses, the new building was wholly unconnected with the business of Ritter’s Cafe. All of the restaurant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Hudson County Water Co. v. McCarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. American Federation of Labor v. SwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by232 opinions

  1. Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Amalgamated Food Employees Union Local 590 v. Logan Valley Plaza, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Allee v. MedranoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Hughes v. Superior Court of Cal. for Contra Costa Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950

227 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API