Legal Opinion

Forgang v. Universal Gym Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 22, 1993No. 03055PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This appeal is from the judgment entered September 30, 1991 following the trial court’s order of a directed verdict in favor of appellee, Abbey Racquetball Club, Inc. (“Abbey”). Appellants, llene, Rhona and Warren Forgang (“the For-gangs”) argue that the trial court erred in (1) entering a directed verdict where disputed issues of fact remained, namely whether appellee retained control of the premises and whether appellee was a landlord out of possession; (2) admitting into evidence a written agreement for the use of the facility for a prior fraternity party where appellants…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Juarbe v. City of PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Ott v. Unclaimed Freight Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Pierce v. Philadelphia Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Cooke v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Person v. C.R. Baxter Realty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Perkins v. DesipioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Fleishman v. General American Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. 51 Park Properties v. MessinaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Castellano v. Local 302 International Ass'n of Firefighters, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County2004
  5. McKnight v. CPC Systems, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API