Legal Opinion
Bauer Bros. v. Nike, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided February 3, 2016No. CASE NO. 09cv500-WQH-BGSPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HAYES, Judge:
The matters before the Court are: (1) the renewed motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 245) filed by Defendant Nike, Inc. (“Nike”); (2) the motion for summary judgment on Nike’s counterclaims (ECF No. 246) filed by Plaintiff Bauer Bros., LLC (“Bauer); and (3) the motion to voluntarily amend trademark registrations (ECF No. 247) filed by Bauer.
I. BACKGROUND
On March 12, 2009, Bauer initiated this action by filing 'a Complaint against Nike. (ECF No. 1). Bauer alleges that it is the owner of registered trademarks for “Don’t Tread on Me” and “DTOM” on apparel. Bauer alleges that…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Marketquest Grp., Inc. v. BIC Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2018
- Caiz v. RobertsDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016
- FLEET FEET INCORPORATED v. NIKE INC.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2019
- Jacobs v. Fareportal, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2020