Legal Opinion
Caiz v. Roberts
District Court, C.D. California
Decided December 15, 2016No. CV No. 15-09044-RSWL-AGRxPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER Re: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [44]
HONORABLE RONALD S.W. LEW, Senior United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Currently before the Court is Defendants William Leonard Roberts II aka Mastermind aka Rick Ross (“Roberts”), Universal Music Group, Inc. (“Universal”), Def Jam Records, Inc., (“Def Jam”), and Maybach Music Group, LLC’s (“May-bach”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment [44]. The Court, having reviewed all papers and arguments submitted pertaining to this Motion, NOW FINDS AND RULES AS FOLLOWS: Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [44] is…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.