Albertson's, Inc. v. Young
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCOTLAND, P. J.
Over two decades ago, our state Supreme Court concluded that a privately owned shopping center that attracts large numbers *109of people to congregate in order to shop and take advantage of other amenities offered by the shopping center is the functional equivalent of the traditional town center, which historically is a public forum where persons can exercise the right to free speech. (Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping Center (1979) 23 Cal.3d 899, 910-911 & fn. 5 [153 Cal.Rptr. 854, 592 P.2d 341] (hereafter Pruneyard).) Therefore, the Supreme Court held that the free speech…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hudgens v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lloyd Corp. v. TannerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Glovsky v. Roche Bros. Supermarkets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Prigmore v. City of ReddingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Ralphs Grocery Co. v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 8California Supreme Court · 2012
- Van v. Home Depot, USA, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Ctr. for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc. v. Irvine Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.