Legal Opinion

Albertson's, Inc. v. Young

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 18, 2003No. C037270PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCOTLAND, P. J.

Over two decades ago, our state Supreme Court concluded that a privately owned shopping center that attracts large numbers *109of people to congregate in order to shop and take advantage of other amenities offered by the shopping center is the functional equivalent of the traditional town center, which historically is a public forum where persons can exercise the right to free speech. (Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping Center (1979) 23 Cal.3d 899, 910-911 & fn. 5 [153 Cal.Rptr. 854, 592 P.2d 341] (hereafter Pruneyard).) Therefore, the Supreme Court held that the free speech…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Hudgens v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Lloyd Corp. v. TannerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Glovsky v. Roche Bros. Supermarkets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  2. Prigmore v. City of ReddingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Ralphs Grocery Co. v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 8California Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Van v. Home Depot, USA, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Ctr. for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc. v. Irvine Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API