Legal Opinion
Van v. Home Depot, USA, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 11, 2007No. B190831PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DOI TODD, J.
Appellants Vernon Van and Mary Rose Barry brought separate actions against Target Corporation, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (sometimes collectively respondents), alleging that respondents unlawfully prevented them from gathering signatures in front of respondents’ stores that are located in commercial retail complexes. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of respondents, ruling that individual stores did not possess the attributes of a public fomm.
We affirm. Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping Center (1979) 23 Cal.3d 899, 910 [153 Cal.Rptr. 854,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hudgens v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- College Hospital, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Artiglio v. Corning Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Glovsky v. Roche Bros. Supermarkets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Ralphs Grocery Co. v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 8California Supreme Court · 2012
- Ctr. for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc. v. Irvine Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Park Mgmt. Corp. v. in Def. Animals, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Ralphs Grocery Co. v. UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION LOCAL 8California Court of Appeal · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.