Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Insurance v. Control Service Technology, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 21, 1996No. 15607PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brogan, Presiding Judge.

In this case, Cincinnati Insurance Company appeals from a summary judgment granted to Control Service Technology, Inc. (“CST”) on the issue of CST’s liability under a lease agreement entered into by CST and Cassady Woodworks. While no facts were officially stipulated below and no affidavits or depositions were submitted, the following facts appear to be undisputed: On August 9, 1990, CST signed a written offer to lease a one-story building at 442 Todd Street in Dayton, Ohio. The offer was entitled “agreement to lease” and was accepted by the lessor, Cassady Woodworks,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. C.R. Anthony Co. v. Loretto Mall PartnersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Dix Mutual Insurance v. LaFramboiseIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Alaska Insurance Co. v. RCA Alaska Communications, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Wichita City Lines, Inc. v. PuckettTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Damon's Missouri, Inc. v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ram Mutual Insurance Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. Rausch v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Cincinnati Insurance v. GetterOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Lexington Insurance Company, as Subrogee of New Plan Realty Trust v. F.W. Woolworth CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API