Cincinnati Insurance v. Control Service Technology, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Brogan, Presiding Judge.
In this case, Cincinnati Insurance Company appeals from a summary judgment granted to Control Service Technology, Inc. (“CST”) on the issue of CST’s liability under a lease agreement entered into by CST and Cassady Woodworks. While no facts were officially stipulated below and no affidavits or depositions were submitted, the following facts appear to be undisputed: On August 9, 1990, CST signed a written offer to lease a one-story building at 442 Todd Street in Dayton, Ohio. The offer was entitled “agreement to lease” and was accepted by the lessor, Cassady Woodworks,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- C.R. Anthony Co. v. Loretto Mall PartnersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- Dix Mutual Insurance v. LaFramboiseIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Alaska Insurance Co. v. RCA Alaska Communications, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Wichita City Lines, Inc. v. PuckettTexas Supreme Court · 1956
- Damon's Missouri, Inc. v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ram Mutual Insurance Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Rausch v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Cincinnati Insurance v. GetterOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Lexington Insurance Company, as Subrogee of New Plan Realty Trust v. F.W. Woolworth CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000