Legal Opinion
Clark v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Decided June 13, 2001No. 09-00-066 CRPublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
A jury found appellant Nathan Clark guilty of assault on a public servant 1 and assessed a punishment of thirteen (13) years confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice — Institutional Division (“TDCJ”).
Background Facts
Amber Eaves, a correctional officer with TDCJ, investigated a rule infraction by an inmate during her shift on May 12, 1997. She copied down his name — -Nathan Clark — and his ID number from his identification card in order to write up a violation on him. Shortly thereafter, Officer Eaves saw the inmate again. When he asked to speak with her, she refused. A…
3Cases cited17 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Wesbrook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Meraz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by76 opinions
- Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
- Lawrence v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Wiggins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
- Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
- In Re Commitment of Morales, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2003
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.